In a bold move to shield Vermonters from the perils of cryptocurrency-related scams, the state legislature has forwarded a groundbreaking bill to Governor Phil Scott’s desk. The proposed legislation, H.659, aims to impose stringent regulations on “Bitcoin ATMs” – cryptocurrency kiosks that allow for the quick exchange of cash for virtual currencies.
The bill’s key provisions include a daily transaction limit of $1,000, a 3% cap on exchange fees, and a one-year moratorium on the installation of any new Bitcoin ATMs machines in the state. This legislative action comes in response to the growing concerns over the use of these kiosks as a vector for fraud, as the anonymity of both cryptocurrency and cash transactions makes them particularly susceptible to exploitation by scammers.
Vermont’s Crypto Kiosks Regulations
The path to this legislation has been anything but straightforward. Initially, the bill was a routine update to Vermont’s captive insurance laws before a new section addressing virtual currency kiosks was introduced in the Senate Finance Committee. Senator Ann Cummings, the committee’s chair, worked closely with the Department of Financial Regulation to craft the language, recognizing the need to protect Vermonters’ savings from the risks posed by these kiosks.
During the legislative process, lawmakers engaged in a spirited debate with representatives from two of the state’s kiosk operators, CoinFlip and Bitcoin Depot. The executives argued that the proposed regulations would effectively price them out of operating in Vermont, with CoinFlip’s senior vice president, Larry Lipka, pointing to the higher fee caps in California as a more favorable environment.
However, lawmakers remained steadfast in their mission to safeguard Vermonters, grilling the executives on the measures they had taken to protect their clients from fraud. The testimony revealed the inherent tension between the kiosk operators’ business interests and the state’s responsibility to ensure financial security for its citizens.
Debate Over Bitcoin ATMs Mislabeling
One of the most contentious points of discussion centered on the very nature of these crypto kiosks and their relationship to traditional ATMs. Lipka’s assertion that “we’re not an ATM” sparked a heated exchange, with lawmakers questioning the industry’s practice of branding these machines as “Bitcoin ATMs” to foster a sense of familiarity and comfort among users.
The legislative process has been a testament to the ongoing challenges within the Bitcoin ATMs landscape and its associated technologies. As lawmakers work to strike a delicate balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding consumer protections, the debate surrounding H.659 highlights the need for continued dialogue and collaboration between policymakers, industry representatives, and financial regulators.
If signed into law, the bill would require the commissioner of financial regulation to report back to lawmakers by January 2025 on the effectiveness of the new regulations in protecting Vermonters. This feedback loop underscores the state’s commitment to an iterative approach, ensuring that the legislation remains responsive to the ever-changing realities of the crypto ecosystem.
Related Reading | SEC Postpones Decision on Ethereum ETFs, Cites Need for Further Review