- Ethereum Foundation urged to improve efficiency, transparency, and accountability.
- The competitive landscape demands stronger leadership and strategic growth.
- Calls for better communication and faster core updates intensify.
William Mougayar, author of The Business Blockchain, has reignited a debate about Ethereum’s future leadership. In a direct message to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, Mougayar stressed the need for the Ethereum Foundation (EF) to adapt to the evolving market.
He recognized Ethereum’s role as the most developer-facing blockchain platform but warned that its competition, many of whom are Layer 2 protocols, are taking advantage of its decentralization.
Mougayar’s message was unambiguous—Ether’s adversaries are gaming the system, appearing to have an acceptance of decentralization but exercising command and control centrally. In his view, even with Ethereum’s espousal of an open environment, its base must drive development.
He explained that the ecosystem is not demanding revolutionary changes but rather a more strategic leadership approach, faster decision-making, and clearer communication.
Slow Development, Weak Communication Raise Concerns
The slow and deliberate pace of the Ethereum Foundation has irritated its enthusiasts. Mougayar mentioned a few of the key grievances in the community, including infrequent releases, a lack of transparent governance processes, and a perception of hands-off leadership. He characterized Paradigm’s recent Ether Acceleration critique as a fair evaluation urging the foundation to shape up.
One of its most important grievances is a lack of dependable communications. Mougayar warned that quiet could generate uncertainty and erode trust in Ether’s direction. He urged that Buterin and the EF must react to feedback, respond to concerns publicly, and lay out concrete actions for improvement.
Leadership Evolution Needed for Ethereum’s Future
Drawing comparisons with technology leaders Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Steve Jobs, Mougayar emphasized that entrepreneurs have to mature with their companies. In his view, most successful leaders surround themselves with dependable mentors and alter their management style with maturing companies.
He argued that Ether would have to transition in a similar manner—not by centralizing but by having flexible leadership capable of changing with the ever-evolving environment in the blockchain universe. Ethereum Foundation is one of the pillars of the ecosystem, and if it fails to adapt, its dominant position will face a challenge.
Mougayar’s call to action, then, is simple: Ether cannot stand pat. There is a desire for change in Ethereum, and even when not all feedback is positive, ignoring it could become prohibitively expensive. The message to Buterin and the EF is unambiguous: Expand with Ether or fall behind
Related Reading: Best Casino Bonuses Australia (2025) – Welcome Offers, Reload Promos & Cashback