Key Takeaways:
- Ethereum’s strategic roadmap shift toward mainnet scalability and user experience has resulted in a 5–10% outperformance over Solana.
- Despite Solana’s fee-generation growth, Ethereum still dominates in stable protocol revenue and institutional trust.
- Ethereum’s fundamental strengths remain intact, particularly in tokenization, DeFi, and long-term token value proposition.
Ethereum’s strategic realignment, which is intended to improve mainnet scalability and end-user experience, has begun to bear fruit. Post-roadmap realignment, Ethereum has beaten Solana modestly by about 5-10%, a progress that, though not spectacular, constitutes an early reward for focusing more on Layer 1 solidity over overdependence on Layer 2 extensions.
Significantly, this realignment takes place after ETH faced flak for the Dencun update, which lowered Layer 2 fees but, in the process, dissuaded activity in the underlying chain. But while these trends are favorable, nevertheless, there still lingers a cautious sentiment around ETH.
The reluctance, according to Arklight Strategies analyst Marcus Trelawney, is probably due to Ethereum’s earlier plateau in growth and Solana’s increasing narrative power.
But Trelawney points out that Ethereum’s institutional alignment and revenue profile have not only survived but intensified, an element that can serve to underpin its valuation stability over the longer term.
Solana surpasses Ethereum during memecoin trading
In terms of protocol fee generation, Solana recently made the headlines for overtaking ETH, especially in times of high memecoin trading volumes. However, an extended look at revenues offers a sobering thought for Solana bulls. Fees on Solana go mostly to validators, with little value to SOL holders.
In contrast, ETH protocol revenues are still 2 to 2.5 times greater, an advantage that has proved resilient, save for fleeting spikes from niche token precipitating factors, like the Trump-themed launches.
However, it emphasizes an important blind spot in Solana’s growth narrative: while Ethereum’s Layer 2 scaling undermined activity on the mainnet, it hadn’t drained overall value quite as badly as thought.
In contrast, Solana’s token model still needs to develop significantly, and an effort to reduce SOL’s inflation rate, theoretically boosting token value, was overwhelmingly voted down by the community.
BlackRock’s Fund Anchored on ETH
Even as Solana’s DeFi TVL has made significant gains, nudging its share from 9.5% to 11.5% year-to-date, ETH still dominates more than half of the total value locked.
More importantly, ETH maintains leading use cases in areas that institutional participants care about most: tokenization, stablecoins, and regulatory-compliant DeFi. For example, BlackRock’s leading tokenized fund, BUIDL, is centered almost exclusively on ETH.
This deep institutional alignment still supports Ethereum’s moat. Although narratives are skewed in favor of Solana at present, the crypto space tends to appreciate long-term network effects over short-term sentiment deviations.
Trelawney observes that Ethereum’s short-term underperformance could just represent an inevitable recalibration period and not structural weakening.
Related Reading | Senate Halts Landmark Stablecoin Regulation Bill as Tensions Over Trump Crypto Ties Escalate