In a recent series of tweets, CryptoQuant, a prominent data analytics firm in the cryptocurrency space, has raised questions about Tether’s position as the 11th largest Bitcoin holder based on on-chain data. The tweets delve into the concept of on-chain data’s blind spots when it comes to monitoring the behavior of crypto whales.
The thread kicks off by challenging the veracity of Tether’s claim to be the 11th biggest Bitcoin holder. In its quarterly report, Tether disclosed that it currently holds an estimated $1.6 billion worth of Bitcoin, a substantial amount that places it among the top holders. However, CryptoQuant’s analysis casts doubt on aligning the information provided in Tether’s report with what is observed in the so-called Tether Bitcoin holding wallet on Twitter.
Interestingly, while the Q4 report from the previous year indicated no Bitcoin holdings, the wallet in question began accumulating Bitcoin during the same time frame. This disparity between Tether’s official report and the observed on-chain activity has sparked interest and prompted a closer examination of the data.
Challenges In Defining Bitcoin Whales
The thread raises a key concern about interpreting on-chain data. There’s a tendency to classify entities that possess over 1,000 Bitcoins as “whales.” However, the analysis highlights a blind spot in this classification method, warning that individual nuances might be overlooked when categorizing entities as whales.
The thread elucidates that this oversight could result in mislabeling certain wallets as “whales,” when in fact, they might belong to exchanges or internal holdings. It emphasizes the need to exercise caution when relying solely on this classification approach, as it can lead to misinterpretations and flawed conclusions.
CryptoQuant further discusses recent trends in the movement of Bitcoin between different brackets (1,000 to 10,000 and 10,000+), as well as a significant surge in exchange withdrawals. These discernible trends predominantly spanned the period between May and July. However, the analysis suggests that these movements might be attributed to wallets within the Robinhood app rather than reflecting broader market dynamics.
In a notable observation, the Bc1 wallet is cited as receiving a substantial influx of around 118,300 BTC coins over three months. It highlights the complexity of accurately pinpointing the motivations and actors behind on-chain movements.
Related Reading | Regulatory Woes: Binance Misses SEC Deadline & Faces Opposition In Nigeria