• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About TronWeekly
  • Write for us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • All Posts
  • Advertise

TronWeekly

Crypto World News

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Opinion
    • Education
    • Best TRON Wallets
    • Beginner’s guide to TRON
    • Tron Tokens
    • Market Analysis
  • Industry
    • Tron Exchange
    • Project Review
  • Press Release
  • Bitcoin (BTC)
  • Ripple (XRP)
  • Advertise
  • About TronWeekly
    • The Team
    • Editorial Policy
    • Write for us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Cryptocurrency News / UNI Burn Could Surge as Uniswap Governance Votes on Major Fee Expansion

UNI Burn Could Surge as Uniswap Governance Votes on Major Fee Expansion

What to know:

  • UNI Burn could increase as Uniswap governance votes on two proposals to expand protocol fees across v2, v3, and v4 pools.
  • One proposal enables protocol fees for selected Uniswap v4 pools across multiple blockchains, including Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Robinhood Chain.
  • A second proposal extends protocol fees to Uniswap v2 and v3 pools on Robinhood Chain, with collected fees supporting the UNI Burn mechanism.

By Zagham Abbas | Edited By Ammar Raza,July 18, 2026, 8:30 PM

UNI Burn

UNI Burn may see a surge because there are two proposals on which the governance of Uniswap is set to vote. In case the proposals get through, it will result in fee collections for certain liquidity pools for the first time on Uniswap v4 and further extension of fee collection for v2 and v3 liquidity pools of Uniswap on Robinhood Chain. Hayden Adams, the founder of Uniswap, stated that the effect on UNI Burn may be significant.

We just submitted two Uniswap governance proposals for final onchain vote:

1) v2 + v3 protocol fees on robinhood chain
2) v4 protocol fees on ethereum, base, arbitrum, robinhood, bnb, polygon, optimism

(third proposal with remaining v4 chains coming soon)

Both direct all new… pic.twitter.com/NUCXxegnte

— Hayden Adams 🦄 (@haydenzadams) July 17, 2026

Both voting initiatives have a closing date that falls on July 26. This may prove to be another vital move towards Uniswap’s strategy to maximize its revenue and reinforce their token burning mechanism in the long run.

Also Read | Uniswap (UNI) Price Eyes $5.034 Upside as TVL and User Growth Accelerate 

UNI Burn Proposal Expands to Uniswap v4

The first proposal is geared towards turning on protocol fees for certain Uniswap v4 liquidity pools on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Optimism, and Robinhood Chain.

This proposal includes the activation of protocol fees on three types of pools, which are static fee pools, continuous clearing auctions pools, and aggregator hooks pools. Another proposal will be made later regarding the other supported chains since the governance contract, GovernorBravo, is limited to a maximum of 10 actions per proposal.

While Uniswap v2 and v3 depend on fixed fee rates, Uniswap v4 permits flexible pool fees based on its hook framework. Fees can vary from block to block, meaning that it is easier to manage the fee aspect.

For this purpose, a plan has been suggested whereby pools would be divided into various families. It means that the protocol would not need to set fees for each pool separately but would operate a certain set of rules for each family of pools.

Robinhood Chain Fee Plan Could Boost UNI Burn

Secondly, there is another proposal from Hayden Adams that is concerned with allowing protocol fees for Uniswap v2 and v3 pools on Robinhood Chain.

All three protocol versions were introduced by Uniswap when the Ethereum Layer-2 mainnet of Robinhood Chain was activated on July 1. The total cumulative swap volume had crossed $6 billion by July 10.

Also, Robinhood Chain, which utilizes the Arbitrum blockchain architecture, witnessed a decentralized exchange volume of roughly $3.1 billion within its first week of inception, largely consisting of transactions by memecoins.

Should the proposal be approved, the fees collected from the protocol operations on the blockchain will also support the UNI Burn system.

Previous Governance Upgrade Set the Foundation

Fees collected under both proposals would support the token burn mechanism introduced through Uniswap’s governance upgrade approved in December.

This governance proposal was passed with 99.9% support and enabled protocol fees for Uniswap v2 and v3 liquidity pools on Ethereum mainnet by burning 100 million UNI tokens out of the treasury. Nevertheless, protocol fees for Uniswap v4 were not activated since the necessary infrastructure was not yet ready.

The deployment of the protocol fee system has since been extended to 11 blockchains. In the last month, the biggest ever UNI Burn was recorded by Uniswap, where almost 186,000 UNI were destroyed in one day.

Both proposals are utilizing the rapid governance framework that was put into practice through Unification, which has enabled the proposals to go straight to on-chain voting after passing the five-day Snapshot poll. The discussions regarding extending protocol fees were initiated back in February.

Also Read | SBI Holdings Expands Asia Crypto Footprint With Majority Acquisition of Coinhako

This article contains market analysis and price predictions. These are not guarantees. Crypto markets are volatile. Always DYOR. Not financial advice.

Filed Under: Cryptocurrency News

About Zagham Abbas

Zagham Abbas is a Blockchain Infrastructure Reporter at Tron Weekly with over five years of experience covering cryptocurrency markets, blockchain infrastructure, and digital asset regulation. His reporting focuses on core blockchain networks, protocol-level developments, decentralized finance ecosystems, and major assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins.
Zagham covers network upgrades, protocol changes, scalability developments, security incidents, and ecosystem adoption across leading blockchain platforms. He also provides market analysis, explaining how infrastructure updates and regulatory actions impact digital asset markets. His work delivers clear, fact-based reporting for both beginners and experienced readers. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and follows strict editorial and fact-checking standards at Tron Weekly.

🔗 Connect on LinkedIn

Twitter LinkedIn

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Solana 2026: Teraswitch Outage Pushed 28% SOL Delinquent August 12, 2026
  • Bitcoin Shows Bottoming Signals as LTH Losses Deepen August 12, 2026
  • Injective (INJ) Price Targets $6 Rally as LI.FI Integration Boosts DeFi Growth August 12, 2026
  • DOGE Price Eyes $2 as Historic Cycle Pattern Signals Explosive Rally August 12, 2026
  • SUI Price Eyes $0.702 Target as Key Support Holds for Recovery August 12, 2026

Footer

News

  • Latest News
  • Altcoin News
  • Bitcoin (BTC)
  • Blockchain
  • Tron (TRX)
  • World

Digest

  • Meet the Founder
  • Price Winning Article
  • DeFi
  • Cyber Security
  • Crypto Scam

Industry

  • Project Review
  • Technology
  • Fintech
  • Tron Exchange
  • New in Town

Tron Universe

  • Event and Tron Parties
  • New in Town
  • Tron Tokens

FOLLOW US

  • Facebook
  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Subscribe US

Editorial Policy | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms and Conditions | Masthead

Copyright © 2026 · Tron Weekly. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: Tron Weekly is an independent crypto news site that adheres to the strict journalism policy anchored on transparency, trust, and objectivity, we have no affiliation with the TRON Foundation, its founder Justin Sun or any other cryptocurrency firm.